[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: His Highness's New Clothes
Poster: "Greg Lindahl" <email@example.com>
> When we begin to seriously state that one may not put forward matters of
> pure documented fact on mundane matters via an e-mail list if those facts
> contradict something the latest prince said, well, it's time to rethink
> our position.
When we begin to have the same kinds of straw-man arguments here as on
the Rialto, perhaps we should re-think the way we communicate.
Seriously, I've seen an interesting division between the people who
think that a courteous public correction is OK and the people who
think that a private correction would have been best, but I haven't
seen anyone say that the matter should have been totally ignored in
public. I haven't seen any one state it as strongly as Henry puts it
above (and yes, I did read Giacomo's posting).
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: firstname.lastname@example.org