[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Poster: Lance Harrop <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Wed, 10 Jul 1996, Henry Best wrote:
> > > Tadhg;
> > > (Ominpotence without omniscience is damn dangerous.)
> > Leifr;
> > It is also impossible, if you don't know everything, then you don't KNOW
> > what you can't do, therefore you're not omnipotent.
> Omniscience is an incidental byproduct of omnipotence. If one is
> all-powerful, then amongst one's powers is omniscience.
> It's the same kind of semantic redundancy that Father Guido Sarducci
> pointed out in the phrase "forever and ever".
It's certainly off topic, but I remember from Piers Anthony's "Source of
Magic" the Demon XANth stated that he was "Omnipotent but not
Omniscient". I wondered then how you can claim to be able to do
everything if you can not claim to know everything.
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: email@example.com