[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: a little consideration
Poster: Kensei <kensei@concentric.net>
At 11:32 AM 11/25/96 EST, you wrote:
>I reply to the nearby table, whose Victor recently spoke,
>
>> what a period poor person would have probably have done. And wheelchairs,
>> how can people actually show to events with these. Any mundanes who saw
>> a person in nice period garb but using a wheelchair would say "Who is
>> this idiot?". Don't they have friends who can carry them around in a
>> litter or something? Or if they don't, they should stay home (a much
>> more period practice, I'm sure). All it takes is a little consideration
>> and thought and you too can be authentic.
>
>--->I guess that any non-SCAdian seeing a garbed individual in
>a wheelchair would look twice due to the garb. Why should anyone,
>mundane or not, care whether or why one uses a wheelchair? Why
>suppose that people outside of the organization would understand
>less than we that certain modern assistance can improve one's
>ability to educate and recreate? Most of the people I have known
>try to be more sensitive than responding to different ways of
>living with "idiot." Alas, not all.
>
> Susanna(
>
>
I believe the juxtaposition of obvious modern personal --conveniences-- with
the medieval was the issue...not modern --necessities--. Glasses are an
interesting case on the borderline: they are necessary, but low-key or
invisible alternatives can be found. Many other glaring modernities are the
same way. I do not believe that necessities along the lines of wheelchairs
would be frowned on by authenticity mavens, however. Victor does pen a nice
satire, though.
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Submissions: atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
Admin. requests: majordomo@atlantia.sca.org