[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
I wouldn't touch that...
Poster: "Ed Hopkins" <Ed.Hopkins@MCI.Com>
> > > PROPOSED for comment: Unpadded pole arms be allowed according to the
> > > SCA wide rules. This would allow pole arms of up to seven feet long.
> > Though I have no discrepancies with a 7 foot pole arm, I think that
> > some sort of padding, at least 1-inch close cell, would do.
> > If you leave the weapon unpadded and 7 feet long the force of a blow
> > would be far beyond that of a 6 foot great sword. I fear the injuries
> > that would result from the extra force that could be generated even with
> > an arc of 90 degree restriction. Though it would not be common place,
> > I think most would agree that tempers can flare on the field. The results
> > of such a weapon, as proposed, could lead to a bad situation before any
> > intervention could be made.
> Here in Trimaris, all we use is unpadded polearms. When I first moved
> here, I thought they were crazy for using them, but I have found that
> having no padding in the head of a polearm tends to make both the user
> and the 'victim' very conscious of blow force.
I would think that for higher levels of blow force, at least,
having no padding in the head of the polearm tends to make the
victim _less_ conscious.
-- Alfredo el Bufon
D A N G E R R A T T A N
C A U S E S S E V E R E
B O D I L Y D A M A G E
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: firstname.lastname@example.org