[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]

[Fwd: FW: [WOrthodox] BIO: Valentine, martyr (14 Feb 300?)]



-- BEGIN included message

Poster: afcarey@norfolk.infi.net

Return-Path: <careydm@federal.unisys.com>
Received: from fsdgate1.han.federal.unisys.com (root@fsdgate1.HAN.Federal.Unisys.COM [192.62.159.20])
	by mailhost.infi.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id QAA08148
	for <afcarey@norfolk.infi.net>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:19:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from homer.MCLN.Federal.Unisys.COM by fsdgate1.han.federal.unisys.com (8.6.12/mls/8.0) 
	id QAA28714; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:16:01 -0500
Received: from fs-exchange-4.mcln.federal.unisys.com by homer.MCLN.Federal.Unisys.COM (8.6.12/mls/4.1) 
	id QAA28577; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:24:24 -0500
Received: by fs-exchange-4.MCLN.Federal.Unisys.COM with Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)
	id <DB740JLH>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:14:19 -0500
Message-ID: <F7EF74F451CDD0118C230000C0707BF3298632@va-bch-1.vab.federal.unisys.com>
From: "Carey, Dan" <careydm@federal.unisys.com>
To: "'aAnne'" <afcarey@norfolk.infi.net>
Subject: FW: [WOrthodox] BIO: Valentine, martyr (14 Feb 300?)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 1998 16:24:42 -0500
X-Priority: 3
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.0.1458.49)

You might want to forward this to Atlantia-l.

> ----------
> From: 	kilroy@copland.rowan.edu[SMTP:kilroy@copland.rowan.edu]
> Sent: 	Friday, February 13, 1998 7:26 PM
> To: 	ceclist@associate.com; worthodox@associate.com
> Subject: 	[WOrthodox] BIO: Valentine, martyr (14 Feb 300?)
> 
> 
> VALENTINE, MARTYR (14 FEB 300?)
> 
> Around this time of year, many persons ask:
> 
> "Who was St. Valentine, and what does he have to do with ending
> romantic cards and messages?"
> 
> St. Valentine is a martyr from before 312, commemorated on the 14th
> of February.  Probably he was martyred on that date, but nothing
> else is known of him. (A Valentine, priest of Rome, and a Valentine,
> bishop of Ternia (Interamna), are both commemorated on 14 February,
> and now generally assumed to be the same person.) In many parts of
> Europe, it was once said that birds began to pair off for the
> nesting season in mid-February. Since our forebears often spoke of a
> given day by naming a saint connected with it rather than by giving
> the month and the number of the day, we find them saying that birds
> choose their mates on St. Valentine's day.  That is all. If a major
> earthquake took place on Columbus Day, it would probably be known to
> future generations as the Columbus Day earthquake, but it would be a
> mistake to try to connect it with Columbus.
>      There are several stories making the rounds that try to explain
> the connection between valentines and Valentine. Every one that I
> have heard sounds like an explanation made up after the fact,
> probably by a Victorian clergyman lecturing to children. There are
> other explanations attempting to connect it with various pagan
> festivals of the early spring.  Again, I am not impressed. That
> young men should send romantic messages in the springtime both in 90
> BC and in 1990 AD does not require a conspiracy theory to explain
> it.
> 
> AFTERTHOUGHT: The chief authority for the statement that 14 February
> is the date when birds were thought to pair off is Chaucer, who
> writes of "Valentine's day, when every fowl doth choose his mate."
> However, it has been pointed out that in addition to the two obscure
> Valentines commemorated on 14 February, there is a still more
> obscure one associated with 2 May, and that Chaucer may have had
> this date in mind. Two arguments for supposing that he did: (1) May
> seems more likely than February for birds to start building
> nests--but I am no expert on birds of England; (2) King Richard II
> was formally betrothed to Anne of Bohemia on 3 May, and Chaucer may
> have intended a reference to the royal couple. He was a member of
> the Royal Court, and was often invited to recite his own poems
> before the King and Queen and others, and his poems contain at least
> one other indirect reference to the Royal Marriage. If we accept
> this theory, then we must suppose that, after all memory of the May
> Valentine had died out in England, Chaucer's statement was
> misunderstood as referring to the earlier date.
> 
> 
> 


=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
            Submissions:  atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
        Admin. requests:  majordomo@atlantia.sca.org

-- END included message