[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re[5]: Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the SCA
Greetings all,
The best thing I have heard regarding this issue was from a Judge
that made comments regarding it in a news paper I was reading in
Rochester NY while on a business trip.
He said, public Internet forums are to be considered an
entertainment, just as cable TV. A service that is a "pay service"
that you need not have. If you subscribe to the service, you
understand that adult material may be included.
If you subscribe to HBO parents and others know they could hear
profanity, view murder, drug use, rape, and all other forms of sex and
violence. If you don't want your children exposed, don't buy it.
Internet is no different.
Access to any entertainment when it comes to children (the main
reason for this) is the responsibility of the parents. If Internet
access is allowed at schools the responsibility for supervision is
with the school. Know any schools with open access to HBO?
This will rapidly become a non-issue. It will however end up
creating a new market and industry. Software and hardware that
controls and monitors what internet access is allowed and used. The
products are already surfacing.
Looking at V-Chip technology. The net affect will result in
broadcast TV becoming more adult. Shows will be able to assume a
v-chip will control what the public wants to see, allowing all nude
tabloid talk shows featuring transsexuals in various action sports
like pie fighting... :)
We'll see,
Alaric "Who will always say what ever he wants regardless" Luther
PS As an aside. It is no longer illegal for the "authorities" to tap
your phone or read your email. They just can't use it in court unless
they had a court order in advance. In fact it's not against the law
for your neighbors to listen in on your calls if they had a scanner
and you were on a cordless phone. Always assume Big Bro is listening,
Let's give him something amusing to read, eh.