[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: New Peerage? (fwd)
Poster: James and/or Nancy Gilly <KatieMorag@worldnet.att.net>
>From: Mark Waks <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Subject: Re: New Peerage? (fwd)
>X-Authentication-Warning: europe.std.com: daemon set sender to
sca-east-approval using -f
>Date: Tue, 19 Nov 96 16:28:40 +0000
>-Poster: Mark Waks <email@example.com>
>Being brief, for a change, regarding Solveig's counter-proposal:
>I still don't like the title much; for some reason, "Marquis" doesn't
>ring my bells at all. But the basic concept is the right one. A Peerage
>today is made up of two parts: the Peerage (is this person well-rounded,
>mature, a good person, etc), and the Pigeonhole (do they Fight/Craft/
>Organize well?). The problem is, we have people who are Peers in the
>most meaningful sense, but don't fit the pigeonholes.
>The right solution is to emphasize the Peerage, and somewhat
>de-emphasize the Pigeonholes; put the emphasis on what the Peerages
>have in common, rather than the ways in which they are different.
>There are many different ways this could be implemented, but broadly
>speaking, the right approach is to unify the Peerages into a single
>concept, and allow Peerage to be granted without necessarily inducting
>someone into an Order.
> -- Justin
> Who's been tilting at this particular
> windmill for about five years now...
>Random Quote du Jour:
>"How many zen buddhists does it take to change a lightbulb?
> How many fish does it take to build a bridge?"
> -- Fujimoto
> To leave this mailing list, send mail to firstname.lastname@example.org
> with the message UNSUBSCRIBE SCA-EAST
James and Nancy Gilly
Dogs have Masters. Cats have staff.
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: email@example.com