[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Merry Rose favors?
Leifr responds to Karen et al....
>Lady Karen the very Dane-gerous has an interesting proposition:
>> Lady Meli and I have corresponded about the possibility of constructing
>> favors or tokens bearing the new `device` of the list -- would there be
>> any interest in such an animal?
>While I would hardly oppose such a suggestion, I would like to point out
>that currently the "Merry Rose" is only a tavern sign, and as such is not
>within the control and authority of the college of Arms. If, however,
>you start to put it on favors, you propose to make it a badge. This
>presents two difficulties. The badge is probably heraldicly untenable,
>that is the college or arms will not pass it. Conversely, in its present
>state, it probably conflicts with something, as I did not try to check it
>before painting the tavern sign (note I did not say emblazon the badge
Yeah Leifr, I know you asked the merman, but first you get the octopus.
Style: It's a great sign, but as heraldry it's gacky. Nevertheless, I
think it might be *legal*.
Conflict: Oops. Ever hear of the "red rose of Lancaster"? It's probably
a conflict. Which is only fitting, as the good ship *Mary
Rose* was in the fleet of a Lancaster/Tudor king....
*BUT* -- who ever said you had to register the thing before using it?
All IMHO of course.
(For those who don't know or remember, a kraken is a ten-legged octopus.)
Evan da Collaureo, Kraken Herald.