Re: Re[2]: Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the SCA

["Mario M. Butter" <mbutter@tower.clark.net>]

But the Justice Department has already released a statement that other
provisions of the CDA *will* be enforced. Like `indecent' discussions.

Mario

Mario M. Butter            |GAT d++$ H>++ s:+ !g !p au+ a?  w+++ v++(-) C++
mbutter@tower.clark.net    |UL++++$ P+>++++ L++>++++ 3 N+++ E--- K-- W---
gaummb@fnma.com            |M-- V-- -po+ Y+ t++ 5++ jx R++ G' tv+++ b+++ !D
#include <std_disclaimer.h>|B-- e* u*@ h---- f* r+++ !n y** GeekCode v2.1

On Mon, 19 Feb 1996, Michael Surbrook wrote:

> Date: Mon, 19 Feb 1996 11:44:17 -0500 (EST)
> From: Michael Surbrook <susano@access.digex.net>
> To: "Mario M. Butter" <mbutter@tower.clark.net>
> Cc: atlantia-l@netcom.com
> Subject: Re: Re[2]: Communications Decency Act (CDA) and the SCA
> 
> On Fri, 16 Feb 1996, Mario M. Butter wrote:
> 
> > > Given even that I am a pro-civil-liberties person, I admit that it is
> > > unlikely that any particular post will lead to prosecution.  At least while
> > > the head of the Justice department reports to a Democrat like Clinton.
> > 
> > Since a `Democrat like Clinton' signed the damn thing, I guess he'd have no
> > qualms about enforcing it.
> 
> Actually, Clinton has already stated that certain sections will _not_ be 
> enforced.  The  part about it being illegal to discussion abortion for one.
> 
> Miachel Limner, esq
> 
> ***************************************************************************
> * "'Cause I'm the god of destruction, that's why!" - Susano Orbatos,Orion * 
> *                              Michael Surbrook                           *
> *                susano@access.digex.net / surbrook@aol.com               *
> *            Attacked Mystification Police / AD Police / ESWAT            *
> * Society for Creative Anachronism / House ap Gwystl / Company of St.Mark *
> ***************************************************************************
>