[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]

new debate

Just to add a historical costume debate to the continuing political ones, 
here is a little something to gnaw on.  I present to you a series of 
quotes for your scrutiny.  The first comes from John Telfer Dunbar, in 
_History of Highland Dress_, pub. 1962;
(on the feile-beg, or little kilt)  "The kilt worn today would seem to 
have originated early in teh eighteenth century, and the evidence of that 
century indicates that it emerged about 1725.  Many attempts have been 
made to produce proof of the little kilt (Gaelic, feilidh beag) before 
that date but nothing so far published can substantiate such claims.  
Some of the most popular "evidence" has been examined and refuted in 
Major McClintock's _Old Irish and Highland Dress_ [which I have not seen- 
	"A most important letter, dated 1768, was published in the 
_Edinburgh Magazine_ for March 1785.  It was written by a man of good 
position and education living in teh Highlands with first-hand 
information on his subject: [he then reprints the letter, which I will 
not do here, unless requested.  The letter states that in 1718 or 
thereabouts an Englishman named Thomas Rawlinson became attracted to 
Highland dress and modified it to make it less cumbersome by removing the 
upper part, saving only the lower kilt to be belted in place]
	"Sir John Sinclair, whose enthusiasm for research on Highland 
dress was renowned wrote in 1830: "...it is well known that the phillibeg 
was invented by an Englishman in Lochaber about sixty years ago.""

I had always taken this to be the story, and never questioned it.  
Recently, while I was doing further research on pre-1600 Irish and 
Highland dress, trying to tell when the two stopped bing similar, and 
when the great kilt arose, I found these other quotes:
James Logan, in _The Clans of the Scottish Highlands_, pub. 1845;
"This part of the dress [the little kilt] has been called a late 
improvement, and introduced by an Englishman!  We are prepared to 
maintain it's antiquity.
And Charles MacKinnon, in _Scottish Highlanders_, pub. 1984;
"The coat of arms of Skene of Skene is of special interest to 
Highlanders, because in the original matriculation of arms in 1672 the 
right-hand 'supporter' of the sheild is a Highlander wearing a kilt 
without a plaid-- i.e. the little kilt of today, as opposed to teh great 
belted plaid which was its forerunner.  This makes nonsense of the claims 
that the little kilt was the invention of an Englishman more than fifty 
years later, since teh Lyon painter could not very well have depicted 
something that did not exist."

Ok, I'm not going to take sides here.  Both cases are presented for 
discussion.  I am interested in your learned comments.  My own personal 
little quest is to find reference to a great kilt before the mid-16th 
century (no luck so far), but I will take my Gaelic garb controversy 
where I can find it.  Has there been more recent finds than these?  
Anyone have an opinion crediting or discrediting one of these Scholars?  
I have heard rumours that the kilt was actually an Irish invention, 
although in all my research I have seen no mention of that in print 
(quite the obvious-- the Scotch and Irish Gaels were alike in dress 
untill the 16th century when the Scots took up the great kilt).  Ok, 
guys.  Run with this info.  Lets see what we can come up with.

P.S.-- on teh subject of Gaelic garb, does anyone have the mundane name 
of Lord Cormac macCliuin O'Domnaill, author of _Beyond the Pale; a survey 
of Gaelic garb, 1500-1650_?
To unsubscribe to the Kingdom of Atlantia mailing list, send a message
to majordomo@csc.ncsu.edu with no subject and the body consisting of:
unsubscribe atlantia