[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Banter: Disc: Pay-to-Fight
Poster: "Chuck Graves" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>> > (Ominpotence without omniscience is damn dangerous.)
>> It is also impossible, if you don't know everything, then you don't
>> KNOW what you can't do, therefore you're not omnipotent.
Actually, no. It has very easy to have power well in excess of your
comprehension. You don't have to look very far to find examples, Leifr.
Besides, if YOU don't know everything, how can you be sure I don't
already control it. 8^)
>Omniscience is an incidental byproduct of omnipotence. If one is
>all-powerful, then amongst one's powers is omniscience.
Now, now, Henry. Surely, knowledge and power are separable quantities. Of
course, if you accept the paradigm that "Knowledge is power", then your
assertion is actually backward--omnipotence is an incidental byproduct of
omniscience...oohhh...that would be Leifr's basic assumption.
I still think knowledge and power are separate. I can never seem to find
them in the same quantity, in the same place, at the same time...or maybe
that should be "sufficient quantity".
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: email@example.com