[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Banter: Omnipotence
Poster: "David K. Bodman" <email@example.com>
At 05:22 PM 7/10/96 -0400, you wrote:
>Poster: Lance Harrop <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>On Wed, 10 Jul 1996, Henry Best wrote:
>> > > Tadhg;
>> > > (Ominpotence without omniscience is damn dangerous.)
>> > Leifr;
>> > It is also impossible, if you don't know everything, then you don't KNOW
>> > what you can't do, therefore you're not omnipotent.
>> Omniscience is an incidental byproduct of omnipotence. If one is
>> all-powerful, then amongst one's powers is omniscience.
>> It's the same kind of semantic redundancy that Father Guido Sarducci
>> pointed out in the phrase "forever and ever".
>It's certainly off topic, but I remember from Piers Anthony's "Source of
>Magic" the Demon XANth stated that he was "Omnipotent but not
>Omniscient". I wondered then how you can claim to be able to do
>everything if you can not claim to know everything.
Perhaps ignorance is bliss...
Besides, then you can claim no responsibility for your actions...
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: email@example.com