[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: heraldic argument
Poster: Michael and MJ Houghton <email@example.com>
> Poster: Rowanwald South <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Good Gentles,
> perhaps it's time to let this go. As far as I can follow this thread,
> it seems to run like this:
> Party A: I can do/wear/show any device/arms I want.
> Party B: Wait a minute! Our rulebook says that's not quite true, and I
> ought to know, I'm one of the referees.
> Party A: My rights as an American are being offended, remember, this is
> just a game, and I can play it any way I want.
> Party B: But, but, but, rules! Customs!
> Party A: Historical evidence says you're wrong, except where it says
> you're right, but I choose to discount that - it interferes with
> my game.
> Party C: Can we talk about something else now?
> Party A: I'm not done.
> As a member of the C party, I am. I LIKE to play our game by the
> rules that we have... they're cumbersome, but they work best for the most
> people. So - if Copora has rules regarding heraldic display and
> jurisdiction, follow them, wouldja, pretty please?
*sigh* I apologize for inciting Party A by insisting on describing the
status quo. I do promise not to continue beyond my two substantive posts.
I am done...
yours in crankiness,
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: email@example.com