Re: Knights What's Required

["J. Eason" <jeason@midmaine.com>]

Poster: "J. Eason" <jeason@midmaine.com>

Perhaps there is some confusion here.  A candidate need not become always
victorious in combat over a knight in order to be considered; however, he
will need to demonstrate an ability to consistently compete on that level. 
The idea being that that individual become an equal not better.  That's why
it's called "peerage".

Respectfully,

Syr Cedric of Thanet
(now pursuing the dream in the frozen north)

----------
> From: Elizabeth Howe <unknown@dpnet.net>
> To: atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
> Subject: Knights What's Required
> Date: Saturday, March 07, 1998 3:38 PM
> 
> 
> Poster: Elizabeth Howe <unknown@dpnet.net>
> 
> >From reading this list for the past few months, it appears that in order
> to be a Knight one must first be better than most Knights that they
> battle.  From all the posts I have read they say that one just becoming
> a Knight must have betten other knights(those above themselves) not once
> or twice but ...
> This is distressing becouse I wonder why you feel that new Knights must
> do better than you did when you were Knighted.  I say this becouse I
> assume that you have continued to get better.
> I appologize in advance for upsetting everyone.
> 
> =======================================================================
> List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
>             Submissions:  atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
>         Admin. requests:  majordomo@atlantia.sca.org
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP:  http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
            Submissions:  atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
        Admin. requests:  majordomo@atlantia.sca.org