[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Arrow Problems
Poster: "Greg Prevost" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
From: Sarah Prunier <email@example.com>
To: firstname.lastname@example.org <email@example.com>
Date: Thursday, November 12, 1998 4:32 PM
Subject: Arrow Problems
>Poster: Sarah Prunier <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>If there were safety tests before the arrow in question was allowed in
>combat then the possibility of an arrow bouncing back nock first would have
>been discovered. Further assuming this phenomenon had been discovered it
>must have been evaluated and determined to be a small risk. As we all know
>that small risk means there is some risk. Therefore unless we can eliminate
>all risk (we can't) then we have to live with the fact that statistically
>there is no way to avoid accidents.
>In summery the only way I feel it is reasonable to pull these arrows is if
>there wasn't thorough testing in the first place.
>Can anyone verify if there was testing? And if so, what type?
>Just trying to look at this logically,
>Sarah of Rencester
>List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
> Submissions: email@example.com
> Admin. requests: firstname.lastname@example.org
go to :
I've read it, sounds pretty thorough to me.
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Admin. requests: email@example.com