[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re[3]: Re[again]: An Old Earl...
- To: chuck_graves@mail.hq.faa.gov, atlantia-l@netcom.com
- Subject: Re[3]: Re[again]: An Old Earl...
- From: Kim.Salazar@em.doe.gov
- Date: 1 Feb 95 13:42:00 -0500
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- P1-Content-Type: P2
- P1-Message-Id: US*ATTMAIL*USDOE;c\em1\950201134135a
- P1-Recipient: chuck_graves@mail.hq.faa.gov, atlantia-l@netcom.com
- Sender: owner-atlantia-l@netcom.com
- Ua-Content-Id: Re[3]: R
- X400-Trace: US*ATTMAIL*USDOE; arrival 950201134200-0500 deferred 950201134200-0500 action Relayed
Tadhg writes:
>Greetings to all the merry here assembled.
>I wonder if Dafydd would postulate an answer to the following paradox:
>-- It is now Recent History
>-- 2nd-generation Oldcastles won crowns after Stew but before Dafydd
>-- I am 2nd-generation Oldcastle
>-- If I win Crown, will it be the second coming of Stew?
>Regards,
>Tadhg
>(make mine venison...)
I further season the pot:
Just to note, Stew is ALWAYS better served on the second day. At least,
that's the way I like mine.
Fernando's reign was called "The Spanish Imposition." If he were to (Heaven
and all Intercessors Forbid) enter again and win, would that be "The
Reconquista?"
-Ianthe kim.salazar@em.doe.gov