[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Borders
His Grace and His Excellency have been kind enough to include us in their
discussion of borders and the division of the Kingdom, re:
> Dafydd wrote:
>
> >> There are clearly situations where the creation of borders (Principality
> >> or Kingdom) is, in the long term, a good thing. If we can form a
> >> characterization of situations where it might be good, and when it
> >> might be bad, we may then be able to see more clearly whether our
> >> current situation fits any of the criteria.
>
> To which Diccon responded:
>
> >I would suggest this is an oversimplification. Borders can not be lumped
> >into the categories GOOD or BAD. All borders create problems. Wouldn't
> >it wonderful if they could all be eliminated. But, borders are a
> >necessary evil. One of the borders Dafydd mentions, Meridies-Atlantia,
> >has permanently stolen almost half the wind from the sails of the poor
> >ship Border Vale Keep, no matter which side of the line they are on.
to which Dafydd responded:
>
> Of course it is a simplification. The affects of every border are going
> to change as the groups around it evolve. But you can't hide from my
> point by calling borders a "necessary evil". By "necessary evil" you
> clearly mean that borders do some bad, but sometimes we need to have
> them for other reasons (which we obviously consider good). So you
> are saying that sometimes borders do more good than evil, right? (If
> not, please lend evidence to your thesis regarding the total dissolution
> of all borders and amalgamation into SCA-pangea :^)
>
> Which was exactly my point. Borders do some good things, and some bad
> things, depending upon the situation and the point of view. If we can
> characterize what these effects are, then we will be able to apply the
> characterization to our current data set:
> Atlantia, internal Principality(s), hypothetical.
>
However, both His Grace and His Excellency have decided to view the
principality issue as being one of dividing the Kingdom. I think we are
better served to view the principalities as algumation (that's grouping,
Diccon ;-)) of Baronies and Shires. I am not proposing to divide the
Kingdom with any long term intent to break it up. I think Atlantia is a
perfect size. I just think it is very densely populated and that
creating a level of group above the Baronial/Shire level would be
beneficial and FUN.
In Service
Leifr
- References:
- Borders
- From: David Kuijt <kuijt@umiacs.UMD.EDU>