[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Selecting Our Crowns
Unto Fhearghuis mac mheic Iain and all other good folk gathered here at
Cheapside, Greeetings from Beornheard of Wearmouth.
The current discussion on how we, as opposed to medieval folk, chose
their monarchs is largely moot. The rules of the Society, and not the
Kingdom of Atlantia, govern how the Grand Cookie will be awarded; unless
we are prepared to take on the Governing Structures, therefore, this is
all sound and fury, signifying nothing.
Not that I'm above a little hot air, myself. So, my comment:
Fhearghuis mac mheic Iain noted that Election by electors and
primogenature, as practiced in the middle ages, would not fit our current
middle ages. However, he omits two other forms of chosing the Big
Kahuna. The first, buying the Crown, as was (nod, nod, wink, wink) done
in Venice. Let's all agree this is a Bad Idea. The second, however, I
rather like. It involves gathering up all your friends and supporters,
and beating up on the friends and supporters of the other guy.
In short, a battle.
My own preference for this form of chosing a monarch grows out of the,
er, skills necessary to field an army. One most not only be the biggest,
badest rhinohiding stickjock on the block, one must have a minimum of
political skills, schmoozing ability, and at least one friend (lest one
take to the field alone). Certies, this form of chosing our Crowns would
select for a *few* more traits of leadership than our current athletic
contest. And, gee, how period - a battle to determine the future of the
- No Subject
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (John J. Hale)