[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: [EK] Re:native american persona? (fwd)
Poster: Mark Schuldenfrei <schuldy@abel.MATH.HARVARD.EDU>
I responded to Tisman, not knowing that the same message went to the list.
With a slight amount of editting, to remove some personal comments, here is
my reply.
Tibor
Forwarded message:
From: Mark Schuldenfrei <schuldy>
Subject: Re: [EK] Re:native american persona?
To: TismanBRos@aol.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 1997 12:00:20 -0500 (EST)
I am just a little unclear on why this is...
You'd have to ask the guys who started the gang... There is an article in
the Known World Handbook, near the beginning, that describes what is known
as the "First Party". Basically, the origin was a going-away party for
someone joining the Peace Corp, and since many of the attendees and
organizers were majors in European and Medieval History at Berkeley, they
threw a Knights of the Round Table party. And off it went.
I know that the major portion of members are of european descent. Were the
charter members of the SCA of nationalities or descents of other cultures?
I don't know who or what they were. Sorry.
What I mean is, did they think that perhaps one day someone that was of
african, asian, north or south american lineage (and wanted to research and
practice their ancestral customs) would come along and automatically persue
the practices of europeans, just because they think there are no other
options?
As I said. It was a party. But they had so much fun, they did it again,
and again, and again, and it grew, and they shared it with others, and it
got formalized, and it grew and grew and grew.
But there are lots of options. There are other re-creation groups for other
periods, there are buckskinners, there are lots! But this football league
plays football.
Since it all just happened, I don't think that people were thinking about
legacies, and caretaking. I think they just liked the game they started
playing, and did the things that made playing that game easier.
I think that the main prescence of the SCA is for personal historical
knowledge. The reason for wanting this knowledge, for most people, is that
they want to know how their ancestors saw things. At least that is the
reason for my taking a Scottish persona, and other people that have taken
on the personas of a like nature because of their family's history.
Lots of people do that. I started out the same way. Now, my primary
"persona" interest has nothing to do with my ancestry. Go figure....
I think that I owe you an explaination for my being upset. I have brought
several new comers into the light that the SCA brings. They become
fascinated with the idea of living in the old traditions (even for a weekend
at a time). When they hear more, such as tourneys, court, and things of
that nature, then their first response is to conform to the european based
lifestyles for persona. Their second response in hearing that they will
probably be the only one that will be researching, practicing, or otherwise
involving that culture, they run.
The Society is so wide, that someone is doing one of almost everything. But
it is important to remember that we are, primarily from European culture.
If I may be so bold as to offer an opinion, I think that American education
leaves us abysmally ignorant as to the true variety and richness of European
culture*S* We see them as a monolithic block, when in fact there were many
hundreds, and over time they changed.
In that regard, there are very few people that do each culture... but
overall we make quite a good tapestry.
(My opinion only) I don't think that we, as a group, support alternate
cultures as open mindedly as we ought. We have a majority of members that
focus on and study europe, but no groups that offer classes on say
traditional Egyptian mummification (although the technique was extended from
the Egyptians time, to that of the kings mummifications in europe), or the
effects of the cultures that were experienced by the crusades (when the
other cultures influenced the europeans in their various ways).
Au contraire: we have a great structure for sharing what people are doing,
and learning. If *you* want to study that particular thing, you can do
that, and integrate it into the Society. We do not lead people to those
things, all that well. But we integrate them. There are LOTS of activities
that have become quite important to the Society even in the last five years,
that we didn't do before.
I admit, I approached this matter as someone that was not thinking
of other's feelings. I just tend to get tired of seeing my friends
decide that they don't want to play, based on the difficulty to
express their ancestral cultures. This is the reason for the fire
in me, as I have had over a dozen people that I am close to grow
from enthusiastic to downtrodden.
For the vast majority of us (me too) "ancestral cultures" go back only 100
or 200 years. Beyond that, we don't know. If we looked at our true
ancestry back 1000 years, we would find that it is as alien to our current
lives as picking "someone elses" ancestral culture. That is part of the SCA
learning process.
But the SCA is not JUST about being your ancestors. It is about learning
the many fascinating things that lead to our world being what it is, and it
is about continuous learning and self-improvement as well. I think that we
can be inviting to almost anyone.
I am truly sorry for my rudeness, and poor judgement.
And, if I offended, I apologize. I've been involved in this sort of
discussion for many years in the Society, and I may have abbreviated my
previously expressed thoughts just a little too much: and that might well
have been interpreted as rudeness.
Tibor
=======================================================================
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Submissions: atlantia@atlantia.sca.org
Admin. requests: majordomo@atlantia.sca.org