[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Poster: Denise McMahon <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Greg Lindahl wrote:
> Poster: "Greg Lindahl" <email@example.com>
> > Well, baronies have definate advantages over shires, a titled head of the
> > group to rally around.
> This may be an advantage to you and your group, but I suspect that
> many current residents of shires disagree with you. People are
> different, you know.
Your pardon, my lord, but, actually, I don't agree with you either,
Leifr. I don't think that it is a necessary advantage to a group that
there be someone "in charge" *with a title* for that group to rally
around. You don't really need a titled person... teams don't. Teams have
their own identity as a team to give them cohesiveness... much like
shires have their identity as a shire.
This ambiguous titled person might make some processes easier within a
group and could also make other processes a heck of a lot more
Some shires in Atlantia have done without them for years and seem to be
doing just fine.
Rowan Berran McDowell
Seneschale of Stierbach
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://sca.wayfarer.org/merryrose/
Admin. requests: firstname.lastname@example.org