[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: authority figures...
Poster: AEdric the Grene <AEdric@mindspring.com>
many waters cannot quench love wrote:
(Cool mail name, BTW)
> how about coming at it from the opposite direction? if you're fairly new
> in the sca - or even if you're a reasonably experienced scadian but are
> dealing with a particular aspect of the sca about which you don't know
> much - then the reasonable and practical way to gather information about
> the sca is to find someone who has that information and learn it from
Yeah, I though about that. After I wrote the post, of course. It is kinda reasonable. I
guess I'm a cynical enough person I've never considered doing that in the SCA or really in
any organization. I generally go to several different sources to get an answer, or to
legal-type documents if they exist... But, you are right, it's a reasonable thing to do.
> i don't think it's unreasonable for people to consider information coming
> from an authority figure as authoritative - it's only natural. but the
> flip side of that coin is that people getting information from an
> authority figure have to remember they're dealing with a person, not a
> talking issue of the red tape, and bear in mind that they may well be
> getting a mix of fact and opinion...
> all of which boils down more succinctly to: "it's good to have a clue." ;)
Unreasonable, no. But, unfortunately not always true. As my other post on this just said,
perhaps the office-holder needs to make clear when speaking for the office. I hate
disclaimer. Much as I love legal-stuff, disclaimers just smack of... Well, I don't know.
Perhaps it reminds me too much of people's tendency to sue over silly things. My problem, I
AEdric the Grene
Anglo-Saxon, KnowItAll wannabe, Cider drinker
Arms: Per Pale, sable and vert (or is it vert and sable...)
Legs: 3'6" (or so)
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Admin. requests: email@example.com