[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
Re: Fuss and Bother about Certain Combat Arrows
Poster: "David Ritterskamp" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
>Ok, valid point, but at 10' (minimum range) I've seen coneheads bounce
>back too, especially when hitting a shield or solid breastplate (shield
>usually the worst-even flat surface... no place to glance) But if
>going to ban baldars because of an injury where the *shaft* of the
>was the problem (fitting through the grill), maybe we ought to look at
>ways to improve the *shaft* of the arrow, or perhaps the nock.
>The problem is physics. That's something we can't fix, at least, I
>as heck can't fix it. :) No matter what you use as a blunt, its going
>bounce off. Period.
[Morgan, I take exception to your contention that "no matter what you
use as a blunt, it's going to bounce off." I designed a combat arrow
that pretty much completely hits and drops to the ground. It's called
the Thumper. It uses a hard plastic cap and a progressive resistance
padding behind it. It's ridiculously simple to make. Its main drawback
is that it is attached to a golf club tube. They used them last year at
Estrella and by all reports loved them. Thumper arrows are about as
safe a thing as you can put into the air. The problem lies with the
fighters that figure they ought to be allowed to block them with their
swords, since they fly so much slower than your average wood shaft. The
archers weren't getting any acknowledgement with regular GCT's, so you
could make an argument that the heavy fighters themselves are
responsible for the current state of affairs with the arrows.]
Ld. Jonathan Blackbow
"Good...bad...I'm the guy with the gun."
-Bruce Campbell, "Evil Dead III: Army of Darkness"
>Mundanely: Shawn M. Riggin
>In The SCA: Morgan Wainwright
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
List Archives, FAQ, FTP: http://merryrose.atlantia.sca.org/
Admin. requests: email@example.com