[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]

Re: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word

To: Lance Harrop <lharrop@mrj.com>
Subject: Re: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word
From: "H L. Falls" <hlf@holmes.acc.virginia.edu>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 1995 14:28:15 -0500 (EST)
Cc: atlantia-l mailing list <atlantia-l@netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950206155138.8394A-100000@otter.mrj.com> from "Lance Harrop" at Feb 6, 95 04:10:34 pm
Sender: owner-atlantia-l@netcom.com

Quoth Leifr Johansson: 
 
> <snip...>
 
> Duke Richard said I am "beating a dead horse" and that I will irritate 
> some people.  As for the first, well, I have seen some interesting stuff 
> so far, and expect to see more.  As for the second, to paraphrase a Baron 
> I know, isn't being irritable their problem, and not mine.
 
   Well, milord, if you irritate folk to the point where they reject your
proposals because they're tired of hearing about them, then it would seem
that _you_ have a problem...

--Landi

Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word
  - From: Lance Harrop <lharrop@mrj.com>

References:
- The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word
  - From: Lance Harrop <lharrop@mrj.com>

Prev by Date: Shameless Plug!
Next by Date: Request for info
Prev by thread: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word
Next by thread: Re: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread