Re: Re[2]: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word

["Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols" <sjvn@access.digex.net>]

> Date:          Tue, 07 Feb 95 16:29:50 
> From:          "Morris, Beth" <bmorris@nacac.nacac.com>
> To:            "H L. Falls" <hlf@holmes.acc.virginia.edu>, atlantia-l@netcom.com
> Subject:       Re[2]: The Principalities Debate, was: The Evil P-word

> 
>      
> Landi says to Leifr:
> 
>    >Well, milord, if you irritate folk to the point where they reject your
> >proposals because they're tired of hearing about them, then it would seem 
> >that _you_ have a problem...
>      
> 
> FINALLY someone has said something on this matter that makes sense.  In 
> fact, I will (informally) count myself among those rejecting the idea on 
> that basis....:-)
> 
Here! Here! 

Alexii

Steven J. Vaughan-Nichols  |QOTD: if not exactly disgruntled,
sjvn@access.digex.net      |he was far from being gruntled -
Infobahn Traffic Reporter  |P. G. Wodehouse