[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Author Index][Search Archives]
RE: The Acorn, and what they are saying
Greetings from Ellwood!
I may have to add a "Psst! It's that annoying Ellwood again...." .sig
like Moreach occasionally uses 8^)
%Lord Henry Best in a note on Lady Anne Elizabeth, our stressed Kingdom
%> Okay, okay. I didn't see whatever post Annie is reacting to either.
Um. Judging from what her response was, I don't think she saw the
post. It seems someone mentioned the post to her, and some things
got left out of the translation somewhere. Again, I apologize for any
offense that might have been given. That certainly was NOT my intent!
%You two are referring to a post by Lady Siobhan entitled "Problems,
%Boundaries, and Some Random Thoughts". It was ably seconded by Lord
%Ellwood. And while it is true that Lady Siobhan wrote it because of the
%principality debate, it was not directly part of the debate, and as you
%can see from the title, didn't use Principality as a keyword, so I don't
%see how you managed to kill it.
%> Annie is a _good_ chronicler.
%I'll second that.
As previously stated elsewhere, I did NOT say she was doing a poor job.
In fact, I think she has performed an admirable job. Thank you, Lady Anne!
I don't know how my comments got so grossly misinterpreted. If I am
expressing myself that poorly, I'll quit the list and say no more. I passed
along comments about how some people I know perceive the _Acorn_.
Too bad I've already deleted my original posting--I could quote you
exactly what was said.... *sigh* Bad net reader, no biscuit. 8^)
%> Anyway, whoever, if you are unhappy about the Acorn, you don't need
%> a principality to fix it. You just need to offer to help out. And
%> now you know Annie's e-mail address and that she could use a hand.
%You know Henry, if you're not going to be part of the debate, then you
%probably should not throw random thoughts like this out. While it is
%hardly my position to defend Lady Siobhan, I can with surety say that she
%would not have suggested, and did not suggest, that principalities are
%needed to fix the Acorn. I wouldn't have suggested that either.
I didn't get that from the original messages either. I don't think either
us implied or explicitly said the _Acorn_ had anything to do with the
P-issue. The topic of conversation wandered down another track.
Where did the idea that the _Acorn_ would fix the P-issue come from???
That's plain silly. Henry, you've been sitting too close to your monitor--
that electron beam must have scrambled something important.... 8^)
Remember, I used a SMILEY!
A somewhat confused, but still amused,